In this case I meant relationships beneficial for all participants. I guess relationships beneficial for only one participants are also meaningful. Now, how do you define a meaning?
I don't consider collaboration being meaningful relationships in the means of interaction between human beings, cos beneficial collaboration might as well occur between companies, municipalities or even animals - collaboration is more technical, not human. If at the end of the day your interests are the ones who benefit not you as a person, then I don't call it meaningful. And I didn't claim that one side is ought to suffer while other one remaining careless - two-way traffic is in :). I just judge it from a subjective position.
4 comments:
there is also a collaboration, no?
it depends what you consider being meaningful relationships
In this case I meant relationships beneficial for all participants. I guess relationships beneficial for only one participants are also meaningful. Now, how do you define a meaning?
I don't consider collaboration being meaningful relationships in the means of interaction between human beings, cos beneficial collaboration might as well occur between companies, municipalities or even animals - collaboration is more technical, not human. If at the end of the day your interests are the ones who benefit not you as a person, then I don't call it meaningful.
And I didn't claim that one side is ought to suffer while other one remaining careless - two-way traffic is in :). I just judge it from a subjective position.
Post a Comment